Task: Prioritize Use Cases
This task is where the use cases are prioritized, so that their order of development can be decided. This task is where the architecturally-significant use cases are identified and prioritized.

The purpose of this activity is to:

  • Define input to the selection of the set of scenarios and use cases that are to be analyzed in the current iteration.
  • Define the set of scenarios and use cases that represent some significant, central functionality.
  • Define the set of scenarios and use cases that have a substantial architectural coverage (that exercise many architectural elements) or that stress or illustrate a specific, delicate point of the architecture.
Main Description

Some of the factors that are used to determine the priority of the use cases may be captured as Software Requirement attributes.  The resulting use-case priorities may also be captured as requirements attributes, so that they can be managed effectively.

For more information on Requirements Attributes, see the Guideline: Requirements Management Plan.

Prioritize Use Cases and Scenarios

A software architect proposes the technical contents and the order of successive iterations by selecting a certain number of scenarios and use cases to be analyzed and designed. This technical proposal is completed and refined by the various development teams, based on personnel availability, customer requirements in terms of deliverables, availability of tools and COTS products, and the needs of other projects.

The selection of scenarios and use cases that are considered "architecturally significant" (e.g., constitute the use-case view of the architecture) is driven by some key driving factors, summarized below. 

  • The benefit of the scenario to stakeholders: critical, important, useful.
  • The architectural impact of the scenario: none, extends, modifies. There may be critical use cases that have little or no impact on the architecture, and low benefit use cases that have a big impact. Low benefit use cases with big architectural impacts should be reviewed by the project manager for possible de-scoping.
  • The risks to be mitigated (performance, availability of a product, and suitability of a component).
  • The completion of the coverage of the architecture (making sure that at the end of the Elaboration phase, every piece of software to be developed has found a home in the Implementation View).
  • Other tactical objectives or constraints: demonstration to the user, and so on.

There may be two scenarios that hit the same components and address similar risks. If you implement A first, then B is not architecturally significant. If you implement B first, then A is not architecturally significant. So these attributes can depend on the iteration order, and should be re-evaluated when the ordering changes, as well as when the requirements themselves change.

Architecturally significant use cases that are poorly understood or likely to change should be prioritized for clarification and stabilization. In some cases, this means further requirements analysis should be done before implementing the requirement. In other cases, some form of prototyping may be best.

Document the Use-Case View

The use-case view is documented in the use-case view section of the Software Architecture Document. This section contains a listing of the significant use cases and scenarios within each package in the use-case model, together with significant properties such as descriptions of the flow of events, relationships, use-case diagrams, and special requirements related to each use case. Note that if the use-case view is developed early in the iteration, some of these properties may not yet exist.

Evaluate Your Results

The use-case view should be checked at this stage to verify that the work is on track, but not to review the use-case view in detail. For specific recommendations on what to look for during the review, see Checklist: Software Architecture Document.

Multiple Occurrences
Event Driven
More Information